Improved recovery of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci with a new selective medium
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Improved recovery of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci with a new selective medium.
A new selective group A streptococcus agar (ssA) (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) was evaluated for the recovery and direct plate identification of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) in comparison with sheep blood agar (SBA). A total of 265 GABHS were recovered from 1,116 throat swab specimens on both media, with detection rates of 98.9 and 91.7% for ssA and SBA, respectiv...
متن کاملGroup B beta-hemolytic streptococci causing pharyngitis.
Group B beta-hemolytic streptococci were isolated from the throats of 49 of 1,110 patients who had pharyngitis. Compared with patients whose throat cultures were negative for beta-hemolytic streptococci, those harboring group B were more likely to have enlarged tonsils (P less than 0.001), exudate (P less than 0.02), and tender enlarged anterior cervical lymph nodes (P less than 0.01). Group B ...
متن کاملTyping Group a Hemolytic Streptococci
Two methods of typing group A hemolytic streptococci have been described: slide agglutination and anti-M precipitin tests. The first, developed by Griffith (1), is more extensively used. I t has the distinct advantages of requiring small amounts of serum and culture, and of a quick reaction time when all conditions are favorable. I t has certain disadvantages: The granular growth of some strain...
متن کاملGroup A beta hemolytic streptococci and rheumatic fever in Miami, Florida. III. Bacteriologic observations on beta hemolytic streptococci other than group A.
متن کامل
evaluation of bacitracin disk for the identification of group ‘a’ beta-hemolytic streptococci
a total of 711 beta-hemolytic streptococci were isolated from throat cultures of patients during 1970-73. these strains were grouped in parallel by the precipitin and bacitracin paper disk method. the former method was established as the standard by which the bacitracin technique was compared. the difference in results was about 5.67%. the greatest error (5.4%) was seen with non-group a strain...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Clinical Microbiology
سال: 1985
ISSN: 0095-1137,1098-660X
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.21.3.307-309.1985